Fresh Air fail

April 24th, 2013

So, remember that Rumpus essay from September? In the long wake of the attention it generated, my friend Zoe Zolbrod and I sat down this month to talk about the perils of personal writing, privacy, publicity, and what happens when Terry Gross comes calling. Our questions, and some answers, went up April 21 at the Rumpus.

ETA: I’m surprised and happy that, 24-hour news cycle be damned, this small piece is still making its way around the internetosphere. The kind people over at Fresh Air themeselves blogged (Tumblr’d?) it, and were very gracious. Thanks so much. And killer indie press Melville House had some generous things to say as well.

Marking time

April 9th, 2013

[I wrote and performed this for the Ray's Tap Reading Series at Chicago's Prop Thtr on March 16, 2013, but subsequently revised it so that it worked better - hopefully - as prose.]

coaster

You know what this means right?

It’s a marker. Visual shorthand for:

I’ve stepped out for a smoke. I’m taking a piss. I’ll be right back.

Barroom semiotics include a host of nonverbal markers like this.

There’s its close relative, the bottleneck carnation — aka the napkin-stuffed-in-the-beer-bottle. Want to back up your drink? Turn over a shot glass. Short on cash? A piece of plastic in a rocks glass marks you as good for the bill.

An entire gestural language has risen up around the ritual of doing a shot alone. Raise the glass high, for the toast, acknowledging the moment of communion you and your fellow drinkers are about to share.

Tap the glass once on the bar before you raise it to your lips – a gesture of respect for the bar.

Toss it back in one swift move – signifying your inner fortitude, showing the world that you’re not a pussy, then clap the empty glass back on to the bar, upside down, visual proof that it’s truly empty.

If you’re a bartender, you quickly learn to decrypt this code.

Because you yourself are a marker, a stand-in for a friend, a therapist, an encyclopedia. A DJ. A babysitter. And when you spend enough time watching from behind the safety of your polished oak barricade you see the signifiers all around, embodied. This woman is a stand-in for that one. That man is a marker for love. The last round, just one more — really — is a easily cracked cryptogram whose meaning is plain: I’m lonely and I don’t want to go home.

Collective understanding of the basics of this code – a rudimentary fluency in its grammar and vocabulary – is critical. Ignore the unspoken language of a bar as a patron and at best you’re marked as an ignorant outsider; at worst you are rude, ill mannered – and if you persist long enough, push it far enough, you will find yourself a literal outsider, in that you will be physically removed from the premises.

Because … here’s the paradox of barroom manners.  The social contract that respects the coaster and the carnation is what keeps a bar running smoothly even as its patrons’ capacity for understanding their own behavior, for acting rationally, for following rules, is diminished, pint by pint and shot by shot. And while Amy Vanderbilt offers suggestions for the cocktail party hostess dealing with a drunken guest (get him black coffee; take away her keys) her bottom line – don’t invite them to the party in the first place – isn’t an option in a bar. Bars are in the business of inviting inebriation, and then managing it.

When accomplished successfully – when the markers are set and the code is running cleanly – a bar can be a expansive space, one that allows all present to, for a glowing moment, be our best selves, or at least see ourselves as such. We are raconteurs and rebels; generous, seductive, loving – and lovable in return.

But then, of course, this expansiveness can contract in the time it takes to drain a shot glass. The raconteur becomes a boor; the rebel a plain old bully. Generous slides into sloppy and lovable tips sideways into a bundle of raw hope and need to which cab fare and a gentle nudge homeward is the only decent response.

It’s troubling. As a bartender I struggle sometimes with the ethics of it all. It’s clear cut when it’s time to cut off the guy falling off his stool. (For which, side note, there’s its own secret code: Take his order for that ninth Jack and Coke, and then just don’t come back. Within a minute he’ll forget all about it. Works every time.)

But there’s still a whole world of bad decisions out there for which the bartender bears no legal liability. And in those late-night moments, when you watch an excitable man work himself up into a boastful balloon of souped-up aggression, or see a pretty woman, too stupefied to think straight, become an opportunist’s prey – it’s confusing. You want to step in – to save them from the consequences of their impaired sense of self.

But they’re adults. They came here to get fucked up – and your relationship to them is temporary at best. It’s your job to be polite, to make conversation, and to make sure they don’t kill themselves, or anyone else.

This is the deal.

Here’s where you can rely on your regulars, those fluent speakers of the code, to recognize the warning signs and help you out. To themselves be your stand-in, while you make someone else a vodka soda, to step between the rake and his target; to bring the big man back to earth before his balloon of braggadocio explodes.

Regulars. They keep the code alive, and teach it to the next generation.

I had a regular for years. I’ll call him Jack. That wasn’t his name, but it sounds appropriately rugged and adventurous as a pseudonym, and I think he’d like that.

Jack was an artist and a gentleman, and literally the first person I met when I started bartending five years ago. My first day on the job I kicked him out because he showed up before I was ready to open. I didn’t know then that he essentially had free run of the place, but he just smiled and nodded and slipped away without a word. When he came back 45 minutes later, it was a fresh start.

Jack was a man of mystery. He had been tangled up with the CIA, he said. Or maybe it was the Foreign Legion. He was friends with the feds – and possibly with the mob. He was making a movie. He was moving to New Zealand. He had endless stories, each with its own shaky relationship to reality. But then just when you thought he was yanking your chain, along would come some politician or celebrity to slap him on the back and claim him as their own.

He was handsome, charming, and mildly nuts. He was also, of course, a drinker. But he had impeccable manners. He was gracious to women and kind to small children. He said please and thank you and he overtipped like crazy. In fact, he was generous to a fault. In the short time I knew him he gifted me with art books and small sculptures, endless quantities of spring rolls and takeout sushi, a preposterously engineered magnetic flashlight, an expensive kitchen knife, and, once, eight pounds of frozen shrimp.

Jack would sit at the south end of the bar in the late afternoon and often on into the night, drinking pints of beer and shots of John Powers, unless he was in a red wine mood, or seeking the kick of an Irish coffee. Occasionally he’d meet up with friends – or with one of several ladies who returned in cycles, the new taking up the slack when the old had had enough for a while. He was an eager conversationalist  – if at times repetitive or mystifying – and for newcomers unfamiliar with the code of the bar he was an endless source of discovery, schooling them in its folkways and its characters, which included us, the staff.

This bartender, he’d say, pointing, was a brilliant composer; that one was a visionary artist; that pair of sweethearts were the perfect couple. Me, I was “a phenomenally talented journalist. One of the greatest writers in Chicago.”

“Jack saw us as all our best selves,” said my friend Jessica, and it was true.  He was of us, and yet not of us. A part of our daily routine and a representation – a stand-in, a placeholder, a marker – for every patron who passed through the door, both a witness to and facilitator of all that transpired, night after night after night.

And then, a few months ago, he died.

It shouldn’t have been a surprise. He’d lost a lot of weight. By December he was gaunt, and increasingly erratic. He seemed a little wobbly. Privately, we worried about him, the other bartenders and I, steering him toward coffee if we could; taking our time refilling his glass. He never complained.

But it was shocking. It happened so fast – we still don’t know exactly why, or how. He was there, every day, and then he was gone.

In the days immediately after his death I came close to quitting. I couldn’t shake the feeling that I had killed him – if not on my own, then in concert with others, bartenders across the city, over the course of years. My respect for the barroom code was shot. I wasn’t feeling polite. I didn’t give a shit about the rituals of mating and camaraderie. I just didn’t want to be party to the destruction of one more single person.

“You’re not having fun, you delusional assholes!” I wanted to scream, as the shots were raised and the pints poured. “You’re in fucking denial! You’re all going to die.”

The first few days after Jack died I kept expecting him to walk through the door with a crooked grin, aviator glasses askew. We all did. But he didn’t, and bereft, confused, we didn’t know what to do.

Collectively, the bar had seen babies and birthdays and weddings, but to my knowledge, no death. So, cribbing from Shinto tradition, or the Day of the Dead, or … something, after those first few confounding days we enshrined him in his corner. For three months, every day, we lit a candle, and set a fresh pint and a shot of John Powers in his spot at the end of the bar.

And as the days wore on the urgency of my anger and guilt burned away. As it usually does as a crisis passes. I didn’t quit. I made an uneasy peace with my small role in Jack’s life, and death. And I regained some small bit of respect for the code. Because no matter how deep the crowd at the bar, there was a new marker in place, and it was universally respected.

Even without a coaster, you didn’t drink the dead man’s beer.

shrine

New year, new blog post

December 31st, 2012

treelights

In 2012 I did something I thought I couldn’t do, something I forgot I knew how to do, something I can’t believe I didn’t do sooner, and something I swore I would never do. Not bad, on balance.

In 2013 I vow to do more something or other. And, also, update my website more often.

Until then, happy new year!

Anthologized

December 27th, 2012

getout_front

As I think I mentioned, Knocked Over is going to be republished next month in an anthology of writing about women’s reproductive rights forthrightly titled “Get Out of My Crotch.” Many thanks to editors Kim Wyatt and Sari Botton, who reached out to me at the very end of their publishing process with the request to include my essay. Other contributors include Roxane Gay, Lidia Yukniavitch, and Katha Pollitt. (Oh that’s not intimidating at all.) The book is slated to drop January 22, 2031 — the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade — and Cherry Bomb Books will donate a portion of all proceeds to Planned Parenthood. I’ll post more info on release events as it becomes available, but in the meantime you can preorder a copy from Cherry Bomb here.

Well, hello

September 3rd, 2012

Things have been quiet here for a while, haven’t they? It was so peaceful! Ah well.

I honestly thought that no one would read the internet over Labor Day weekend. I was wrong. Since The Rumpus published my essay Knocked Over: On Biology, Magical Thinking, and Choice, the response has been overwhelming. So I just want to say a heartfelt THANK YOU to all who have read it, and commented on it, and shared it with their friends and neighbors. It was hard to write about something this fresh and personal, and the prospect of putting it out in the world was terrifying. But the feedback so far has bowled me over, and I am very grateful.

I want to thank in particular the women who have written to me privately with their own stories about hard reproductive choices and the strange gray fog a miscarriage can create. Every story is in turn heartbreaking and inspiring, and sharing them feels, right now, like the most important thing in the world.

I gush. But you are my heroes.

ETA: The full text of “Knocked Over” can now also be found here, on this very website.

Coming any day to a bookstore near you

October 7th, 2011

bookcover

I am over the moon about how this turned out. It just looks SO GREAT. Many many thanks to Sheila Sachs and Paul Dolan for being so very talented.

So, yes, the book is on its way to a bookstore shelf near you; please, if you can, buy it from an indie, from the publisher, or direct from me. We get a few more pieces of gold that way, and you’ll be doing your part to support independent media, in both its production and distribution.

To make it easy - at least for Chicagoans - we’re throwing a book release party on Wednesday, November 2, from 7 to 9 PM at the Hideout, 1354 W. Wabansia. We’ll have books for sale, and soup and bread from a wide range of donors, and a DJ and beer and, basically, a furious good time. A portion of the proceeds from all books sold at the party, and all donations raised, go to the Greater Chicago Food Depository.

If you are not familiar with what is euphemistically referred to over on the right as “my other blog,” I’d urge you to check it out, for more than you could ever want to know about Soup & Bread and its evolution over the years.

But here, in a nutshell, are some of the nice things people have been saying:

Time Out Chicago named it “One of the ten essential cookbooks for autumn.”

Chicagoist says the book is “just as stunning to read” as the first one; Grub Street Chicago concurs, but they used the word “adorable.”

And out in Baltimore, Examiner’s Tamar Fleishman called it “one of the most thought-provoking (and appetizing!) books I’ve picked up in a long time.” How nice is that?

As things ramp up on the soup scene, I will try and post updates here. But, well, if I run out of steam just trust that I’ll get back to this forum eventually. In the meantime, if you’re wondering where I am, the Soup & Bread blog as and the Facebook page for the book are both good places to look.

Hope to see you on the 2nd!


Busy days on the soup beat

November 12th, 2010

img_0214

Are you wondering where I’ve gone? Most of the action is over on the soup blog.

And when I’m not there I’m running around trying to wrap up work on the next edition of the Soup & Bread Cookbook, to be published in November by Evanston-based  Agate Publishing. It’s a hybrid: part cookbook, part social history of soup as community-building tool, pairing recipes from the last three years of Soup & Bread with stories about *other people’s soup schemes.* Like this. And this.

The scope of the book stretches from contemporary soup-based projects like those above to encompass soup kitchens, community meals, chili cook-offs, crazy art projects, and just about anything else I can cram into the, uh, pot.

Now, there’s a sound case to be made against sharing your work in progress, but I’m willing to take the risk. Because if the examples above get your stock simmering, you can lay claim to membership in the exclusive club that is our target market — and you also might be able to help. Do you know of such a project or tradition? Some homespun soup circle; some enterprising soup visionary? Please let me know (um, soon) at soupnbread10 (at) gmail (dot) com. Thanks so much!

OK, back to work.

Logan Square Kitchen

October 18th, 2010

Not exactly breaking news, since it hit the streets October 6, but for the record here’s what I’ve been working on for the last month — a feature on the agonizing bureaucratic odyssey of the shared-use Logan Square Kitchen.

I have to confess here that when I hit send on the last round of revisions, my cell phone still sizzling from a day spent burning up the City Hall phone tree, I was convinced I had just filed the most boring story ever. Who on earth was going to read this? Zoning geeks? Fiends for the minutiae of the municipal code?

A day later, perspective gained, I felt better. But, still — judge for yourself.

In a nutshell, this is the story of a small startup business trying to gain its footing in a lousy economy. And not just any old small business, but one whose explicit reason for being is to help other small businesses find their footing as well — and do it in a space designed to best reuse the existing resources of its neighborhood. What could possibly go wrong? Well, when you’re got three city departments all weighing in, you’d be surprised.

If, after you’re read to the end, you are moved by this tangled tale, you can go to LSK owner Zina Murray’s blog and download a letter of support to send to Mayor Daley. And stay tuned for updates — I’m planning to follow Murray all the way to the zoning board.

Fun! What ever will I wear?

UPDATE: Zina wins!

James Ellroy: Belligerent feminist?

September 28th, 2010

cover00

Here’s a link to another recently published something: a review in Bookforum of James Ellroy’s new memoir, the Hilliker Curse. Subtitled “My Pursuit of Women,” it’s essentially that — a twisty travelogue through his romantic life. It’s not an easy ride, though there’s much to enjoy about it. And, interestingly, for all the torment love and lust have caused the man, they seem to be doing well by him. My friend Seth said it well (OK, he “said” it on Facebook…):

“I think his simultaneous awareness of and total inability (or lack of desire) to overcome his own juggernaut pathology does make an important point. These experiences of gender, power and love loom so huge in people’s lives that they become living myths. Awareness by itself isn’t usually enough to change them. Though it can–almost parasitically– profit from them.”

Industrial Harvest

August 10th, 2010

dscn1135_01

I spent a several weeks this summer hanging around with Sarah Kavage, creator and executor of Industrial Harvest, an elaborate — and supercool — project aimed at sorting out and making manifest the intimate relationship between the commodity futures market, the city of Chicago, and the food we eat. And then I wrote about it, and the Reader put it on the cover of the paper. [Kudos, by the way, to the Reader art department. That flour sack is really pretty.]

Just in time, too, as all of a sudden the wheat market is again front page news.

Sarah will be in town for a few more months, so if you haven’t gotten your bag of flour, you’ll have plenty of additional opportunities. In fact, she’ll be at Veggie Bingo tomorrow (August 11) talking about her project, distributing flour, and maybe playing a few rounds. That’s from 6-8 at the Hideout, 1354 W. Wabansia. Come on out!